Photo with 35 notes
“I read Selina’s book all through again & cried all over again… it really is a very good book.”
—Diana, in a letter to Pamela
Here’s the cover for Vintage’s forthcoming edition of Selina Hasting’s biography NANCY MITFORD. The title design is adapted from a custom bookplate that Naunce used in her private collection.
SURPRISE: I recommend you put this hot number on your summer reading list. It’s just as entertaining and compelling as Naunce’s own novels—you can gobble it up in an afternoon, but it will stay with you forever.
Quote with 49 notes
‘He was the great love of her life, you know.’
‘Oh, dulling,’ said my mother, sadly. ‘One always thinks that. Every, every time.’
Post reblogged from with 81 notes
Jane Smiley
Let’s pretend that we know no more of Nancy Mitford than we do of Shakespeare, that we have a tempting outline of her life with one or two intriguing details, but no family notoriety, no volumes of letters, no newspaper articles or gossip. In fact, let’s pretend that Nancy Mitford’s novels weren’t written by the famous Nancy Mitford but by some entirely obscure Mary Smith, who happened to be a middle-class daughter of a greengrocer, possessed of ambition, eloquence, and extraordinary powers of observation. If we did so, how would the novels hold up?
There are eight of them, written over the course of thirty years. Vintage has reissued five, Wigs on the Green (1935), The Pursuit of Love (1945), Love in a Cold Climate (1949), The Blessing (1951), and Don’t Tell Alfred (1960), leaving only Highland Fling (1931), Christmas Pudding (1932), and Pigeon Pie (1940) out of print. The jokes are funny, and they are daring, tossed into the narrative in an offhand way. Sophia, the protagonist of Pigeon Pie doesn’t hear about the start of World War II because she has been visiting her father in Scotland, “a widowed peer, who could write his name, Maida Vale, but little else.” When Sophia’s wealthy husband gets involved with “the Boston Brotherhood, one of those new religions which are wafted to us every six months or so across the Atlantic,” she must put up with Florence Turnbull, who remarks, “Personally, the only people I care to be very intimate with are the ones you feel would make a good third if God asked you out to dinner.”
In Wigs on the Green, a bored married woman known as “the local beauty” is persuaded by a charming scoundrel that her potential lover is a dashing representative of eastern European royalty, when in fact he is a London office worker who has just received a small legacy. In the meantime, her husband goes to a cattle sale to buy a cow: “He bought the wrong one at an exorbitant price only to discover that his purchase was lacking in that desirable piece of anatomy—the udder.” All of Mitford’s characters accept infidelity as routine and unimportant, all of them are suspicious of Americans and their earnest professions of belief, and all are observant and irreverent—chaos is not only inevitable but desirable, or at least amusing.
But there is no real sense, in the pre-war works, of the grandeur and sophistication Mitford would achieve in the last four.
Photo reblogged from CoverSpy with 9 notes
The Pursuit of Love, Nancy Mitford (F, 20s, black knit cap over long brown hair, with cheek in palm, C train) http://bit.ly/i1rJhD
Yes! Yes! A thousand times yes!
Photoset with 14 notes
gpoyw iii
Yammering at a captive (and paying!) audience about the nemesisterly ways of those Mitford sweeties at Meet the Lady: Frenemies and Nemesisters.
Source: Flickr / 92ytribeca
Photo with 9 notes
The Mitfords! Pictured here are Diana (l.) and Nancy (r.), dressed in terrifically bizarre sweaters. The photo, I’m afraid, is anonymous. In addition to these two, there were four others (Pam, Unity, Decca, and Debo), and all six were able to get tongues wagging worldwide. I’m giving a presentation on this Coven of Controversial Country Girls at this month’s installment of Meet the Lady: Frenemies and Nemesisters! It’s a highbrow tale of Communism, Nazism, literary bitchery, and missing scrapbooks. You can’t go wrong.
Source: 92Y
Video with 1 note
Page 1 of 2